![]() |
FIGHTING
DOWN TO THE ZERO Fight Club |
||
|
POSTHOC
RATING: **1/2
My
friend, a self-described anarcho-nihilist, gazed disdainfully around the
well-trimmed neighborhood and said, “I’d like to drop a bomb on all of
them. Blow them all up.” Several
thoughts occurred to me. Like
how many of the people he wanted to blow to bits might be already suffering
from AIDS or any other variety of diseases lurking out there. And if they
weren’t, suffering and death would eventually come to them (as it does
to us all) if only he’d show a little patience.
I’ve met my share of shallow people and some even wear beards,
long hair, berets and write poetry in Mission coffeehouses.
They may wade in a less fancy pool, but it’s still shallow. These
thoughts rattled in me again while watching Fight Club a presumptuously daring
film that I was initially looking forward to, but having seen, can just
as soon forget without much effort. Though it promises to be controversial
(and it is), it also turns out flat, unaffecting and naively wrong-headed.
The
always-excellent Edward Norton plays the Narrator, a nameless Yuppie in
a nameless mega-city who slaves for a multinational high-tech company.
The System has so atomized him he’s turned into a Support Group junkie
in a desperate search for community.
In a hilarious sequence he joins such groups as Remaining Men Together
(testicular cancer), Weeping Women – Onward and Upward and Partners in
Positivity. He’s
not suffering from any of the ailments plaguing the other participants,
but wants to suffer both to cure his loneliness and in the belief (which
seems to be unique to certain upper class intellectuals) that only suffering
is a meaningful ennobling state. But
his charade crumbles when he meets slutty and cynical Marla Singer (Helena
Bonham Carter) another Support Group junkie. Her presence, which mirrors
his phoniness, only pushes him off the deep end. Out
past that deep end, he meets the mysterious Tyler Darden (Brad Pitt),
a peripatetic soap manufacturer and devilish, dynamic nihilist-rebel who
is everything the Narrator is not. Charismatic like dynamite, he’s a Susan
Faludi and Robert Bly fantasy (with a shot of San Francisco’s own Yuppie
Eradication Project founder/hero Nestor Makhno) all wrapped up into one. Tyler
is a fountain of Nietzschean wisdom, spouting such ideas as “The things
you own wind up owning you” and “Losing all hope is freedom” with the
glib energy of a carny barker. After
he finds his apartment mysteriously blown-up, the Narrator moves into
Tyler’s ruined, leaky empty mansion in an abandoned industrial park. It’s
here that the fun really gets rolling. The Narrator and Tyler form Fight
Club, an ultra-secret organization where lonely disaffected men gather
not to weep, but to punch each other’s lights out and so get in touch
with what it means to be a real man who’s truly alive.
It’s a flipped out nightmare of a community whose goal is not self-improvement,
but self-destruction. Soon
Tyler molds Fight Club into something even more radical: the Mayhem Project.
From punching each other they turn to jabbing at Society with a series
of pranks that start out hilarious (like picking fights with strangers)
and mostly harmless, but eventually turn deadly.
Like all radicals, right and left, up and down, Tyler, Fight Club’s
Führer has no sense of proportion, no sense of when to stop. He can’t quit, because the pursuit of the Absolute
is the only thing there is for him. He’s like New York’s Rudolph Giuliani,
but with no electoral mandate to back him up or (blessedly) vote him out.
We’re going whether we like it or not. His idea of stripping everyone
of their material possessions in order to achieve true freedom is a crock
when, in its place, it’s clear he intends to build a fascist state (and
we all know how fascists feel about freedom). You
may think the Narrator realizes the ultimate horror of what they’re perpetrating
and puts a stop to it, but no. Despite
some attempts to satirize the fascist underpinnings of this group of Unmerry
Pranksters, the film ultimately embraces its ideals, with only a trace
of real world ambivalence or ambiguity.
It’s a thesis film and thesis films can’t deal with messy facts
like when you blow up giant skyscrapers, there’s no way you’re not
going to kill innocent bystanders. Fight Club’s romantic pretensions only draw attention to its shallowness.
Tyler’s assertion that self-improvement is masturbation only begs the
question as to whether self-destruction is the same. Perhaps existence is only a cradle-to-grave
jerkoff. But Fight Club is as glib as
the capitalist ideology it rails against.
It’s likely true that in order to fight your enemy, you must become
as shallow as he is. That may be the inevitable business of politics.
There’s
much to enjoy in Fight
Club. It knocks itself
out to be entertaining. Besides Norton, Brad Pitt makes quite an explosion
as Tyler, somewhat altering my view of him as a pretty dullard. Meatloaf
Aday is hilarious as David, whose testicular cancer treatments have given
him a spectacular pair of breasts. And director David Fincher has a great
eye for spectacular, surreal imagery and a deft touch with comedy. Helena Bonham Carter, on the other hand, does
the best she can with what is really a thankless role. Her Marla exists
solely to push the Narrator to meet Tyler and then redeem him. By extension,
this would apply to all women in Fight Club’s brave new world. Towards
the end, the film takes a turn alá The
Sixth Sense and goes flat. Though the phallic symbols of Millennial
Capitalism topple, there’s no feeling of triumph, satisfaction or real
hope for a new beginning (even though Marla is there to hold the Narrator’s
hand . . . and that’s all she’s there for). We already sense
that what’s coming in its place will be just as bad and we’ll all get
fooled again. It’s
a funny place to bring up a Charles Bronson movie, but I will here. Twenty years ago, he made, with director Walter Hill, a film called
Hard Times, a very good drama
about Great Depression hoboes who eke out a living by bare-knuckled street
boxing, a world as secret and unknown as Fight Club’s. But Bronson’s character
was sympathetic, because he wasn’t acting on self-indulgent bourgeois
notions of “spiritual malaise” but for his own basic survival. He was a limited man acting in a set of circumstances
over which he had few choices, none of which were good. But
the characters in Fight
Club are only whiners who exist to score ideological points. To me their emptiness springs from a lack of
imagination and sense of responsibility for their own souls. The film’s
thesis allows them no choice but to follow Tyler the Pied Piper on his
madly righteous goose step into the embrace of the Big Icy Zero. Nothing
in this film makes me want to follow. At best, its brutal violence will
only inspire a few groups of knuckleheads to form their own pugilistic
self-help groups. I hope they’re happy, but don’t look for Fight Club to knock down the System
anytime soon.
|
|||
|
Reproduction of material from posthoc is prohibited without written permission. Copyright 1998 posthoc posthoc@posthoc.com |
|||